|
|
|
2004 |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
||||||||||||
|
2006 |
||||||||||||
|
2007 |
||||||||||||
|
2008 |
M |
Y |
Mar |
V |
A |
C |
A |
T |
I |
O |
N |
! |
|
2009 |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
June |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
2010 |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
June |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Some
years back I read The Three Musketeers by Alexander Dumas. I
remember the basic plot, but what struck me most was the phrase “fly
the pie.” As the king was on the road, periodically his
entourage would come to a halt, as “the king decided to fly the
pie.”
As I recall, it was never explained exactly what
this entailed, except that everyone had to stop while this happened.
What could it mean? Of course, I could look it up on Google, but that
would shatter a spellbinding mystery. So, there are the obvious
speculations:
Some kind of birding activity. The king puts on his leather glove and releases the hawk, etc, however that sort of thing gets done. This gets points for credibility, plus birds fly and all that. There is a bird of prey called a “kite”after all.
A euphemism for defecation. This is pretty funny, and anyone who's ever been on a road trip will recognize the necessity, but I can't imagine Alexander Dumas thinking, “You know, this would be more realistic if people went to the bathroom more.” Besides, only the king gets to do it. That might be flattering to he king, but it seems less realistic than simply not mentioning the need or the activity. Besides, who would want to read about that? Before you think about sending an email, that was a rhetorical question—I don't really want to know.
Least likely of all is “fly the pie” is equivalent to “fly the airplane.” Technologically too advanced for the period Dumas was writing in, and Dumas didn't write science fiction. I think. Anyway, were Dumas to introduce such a device, I'm sure it would play more of a role in the story—perhaps even providing an exciting, daring aerial rescue at the last minute.
The king could “fly the pie” the way a college kid could fly a frisbee, or the ancient Greeks would throw a discus. I like this explanation the best, and there's nothing that makes it impossible. Plus, I get this image—the king, whirling about madly, clutching a fresh apple pie, only to hurl it towards the trees, laughing maniacally and pointing as the pie explodes on a nearby pinetree trunk. All his attendants and so on would have to pretend to be amused by this, or lose their jobs (and maybe even face the guillotine). I heard some of the French kings were like this anyway, so it isn't impossible. (It makes the musketeers admiration for the king a little odd, though. I mean, they're supposed to be champions of the downtrodden, or at least they ought to be. Serving an irresposible king like that makes them seem weak, or like chumps. Of course, this was written in the age of kings, so what else can you do? It opens up a whole realm of speculation, perhaps for another occasion though.)
Another good question is why the musketeers were called “musketeers.” Wouldn't that imply that they used muskets? But they used swords, not guns. Admitedly, I've always been bored by sword fights in the movies, but there's a romanticism to them that you don't get with a bunch of guys fighting with rifles. More light and noise, but less finesse. And I guess finesse was what Dumas was aiming for.
________________
Pies are inherently funny. There will be more entries concerning pies.
________________
Some things strike you as being funny when you're trying to nap and a cat is on your chest. Because when you start laughing, then the cat digs in to your skin to keep from being dislodged; and your natural desire to be scratched and injured will make the dumbest things seem like the height of hilarity. It's all part of nature's way of keeping humor managable and contained, so that only licensed humorists will be able to make you laugh. Otherwise, we'd have too much fun, and that would strike you as chaos...chaos in the flesh. Or at least a nice suit.
Of course, in the above paragraph, read “me” whenever I wrote “you,” “I'm” for “you're,” and “my” for “your.” Except for the “you” after “Because when;” that should be an “I..” And for “natural desire” the reader may substitute from any item from a menu of their own creation, at no extra charge, subject to availability.
So, I guess you could just say this has nothing to do with cats, or humor, or anything you're familiar with, and chalk this up to some kind of random, uncategorized, half-assed madness, and consider me a disturbed individual. Well, okay, fair enough. That would make me pretty sad if you were to say that to me, and I guess I can't stop you. Except that you don't know who I am, and I haven't put an e-mail address anywhere here. So I guess the shoe is on the other foot, and for the moment, that foot is mine.
________________
I had a (fully clawed) cat resting on my chest, and I mentally referred to her as a “sleeping pie” because, let's face it, cats who are sleeping are always cute—the number of posters of same, emblazoned with “Friday's coming!” and what not, testify to this—also, I was tired, and Leela is pretty cute for a cat. (For the record, she was named after the Louise Jameson character from Doctor Who, and not after the gal in Futurama.)
So where was I? Oh, yeah, Sleeping Pie. This phrase made me laugh quite noticably, as I saw from the wounds in my skin, so I tried to classify why it made me laugh.
First of all, pies are funny. See one of the previous entries for proof, I can't be bothered right now. Secondly, a “sleeping” pie gives rise to all manner of speculation. Such as:
A sleeping pie could be a type of pie that just sits there on the shelf, resting. Resting for what? Are you sure you want to know? I didn't think so.
A sleeping pie could be a kind of Mickey Finn, ie, a sleeping potion given to the unwary. “I gave him two slices of the Sleeping Pie, you should be able to rob him with ease and find out who has the One Ring!” Wow, that's pretty scary! But remember, it is only speculation at this point and no cause for alarm.
It could simply be the name of the pie, as Shoe Fly Pie contains neither shoes nor flies. At least, one hopes that is the case. I would not want to eat such a pie otherwise. Gads, we have to eat enough flies and fly products as it is, and any visit to a bowling alley would put one off of eating shoes pretty much forever. (I am open minded, and those of you out there who would enjoy eating shoes of course have my sympathy and support, but I refuse to say you are a majority. So stop writing letters! At least, stop writing them to me. Please?) Where was I? Anyway, one can imagine a weary traveller asking for desert after consuming a pizza or some Philly cheese steaks, and inquiring about the name of the only desert left, being told “It's called sleeping pie because that's its name. Nothing more. Oh, it moves a bit less than the other types of pies, perhaps that's why as well. But it isn't anything to worry about. Much. Here's the name of a good doctor in town.” Also, key lime pie doesn't have any keys in it, I know for sure about this one. I hope. Hang on while I call my doctor...the only doctor in town. Argh, enough of these pies! Will they never stop tormenting me? Here, here, it is the baking of the hideous crust! (As Poe might have written, had he a lot less talent than he in fact, had.)
________________
“I've got it!” said the old man, his voice shaking with excitement. “We'll make everything into a sausage!”
“Even bees?” asked the child. And the room was stilled.
________________
I can't speak with any authority, only from personal experience, but one of the most annoying things about flies is the noise they make when they wander about. In fact, I have to wonder if it bothers them. “There's that damn noise!” thought the fly, as he went in search of more areas to soil. “That buzzing, droning sound! It makes it impossible to think, that sound! I wish I knew what was making it. As it is, it is so irritating that all I can do is follow my instincts mindlessly. Fortunately, I'm good at that.”
________________
Why don't elevators have Error buttons? You know, you get in one, your “pal” says “The fifth floor” and you push the 5 button. Then he says, “Oh, sorry, did I say five? I meant ten.” And so you push 10, but now you have to stop at five. And you know how elevators are. When they stop and there's no one there, they're all like, “Hello? Helloooo? Anyone there? Well...okay. I'll just wait for a long time, just in case.”
How much better if you could push a button and undo some of the buttons you pushed by mistake. Everyone would be a lot happier on elevators, in fact, pushing buttons like crazy might become a new kind of game at the workplace.
Telephones are the same way. Of course, if you misdial the sixth number out of seven, you don't have to call the incorrect number in order to dial the correct one; you just click the reciever and start over.
________________
Insects have adapted (and arguable invented methods to adapt) to the world in myriad ways. They're pretty smart, and will no doubt outlive us all. Their cousins probably live on countless planets throughout the universe. Some of them, with technological, phiosophical and artistic achievements far beyond our own.
Humans would be love to be half as clever and adaptive. But we try. I give us that.
But what about cats? Well, as I try to write this, my cat is snug against the CD drive on my computer, so I can't remove the CD that's in there now. I could move her. I could. But I'd rather wait until she found somewhere else to rest.
I fear for our insect conquerors.
________________
Speaking of cats, have you noticed that they are a lot like beers? You always think, “One more won't hurt....”
________________
As of April 30, 2004. To be continued....
________________
I wonder where the guy who invented
bottlecaps got the idea. I expect he created a new form of bottle
(shorter than most) and thought, “Corks are so old school. I
need something with mad props.” So, to clear his mind, he went
on a sea voyage and happened to be looking in the ocean once, and saw
some jellyfish. “Yeah, like that! Something that could wrap
around the neck of the bottle and protect it. Only made of metal, and
not jelly. Cos I don't think the 'cyber' concept is invented yet. And
without the stinging tentacles, because I don't think beer drinkers
are ready for that.” Well, maybe he didn't think of that cyber
bit, but you have to cover all the bases or historians will just
reject your ideas.
Ahem. Anyway. Um, really, if you look at
bottlecaps, they look like jellyfish, don't they? Be honest, now.
Yes, yes, jellyfish don't have logos on top or cryptic slogans or
jokes underneath their bells, but I imagine these concepts came at a
later date in the evolution of the bottlecap. I'd be willing to place
money (but not a lot) that the first bottlecaps were just plain
metal...in line with the jellyfish concept! “A 'logo'?”
yelled the bottlecap inventor. “What madness are you howling!”
(I can imagine “what madness are you howling” would be a
great deterent to most salesmen.)
Where were we? Well, I bet
after dealing with those salesmen, the inventor thought, “A
jellyfish uses stinging cells as defense...but I'm right out of
those. And the jelly I like has all rotted and stuff, and never
really worked, anyway, curse the luck! Wait, I'll use unpenetrable
metal instead!” And so we have bottlecaps now.
Well,
actually now, we have plastic screwable caps on most beverages. But
even though there are jellyfish that look plastic screwable caps (you
could look it up on the internet and you'd find out what everyone
already knows), I'd bet that these evolved from the earlier, more
primitive bottlecaps, and not from screw-top jellyfish and what they
and their sea-faring brethren already know.
It makes you think,
doesn't it? Wait, don't answer that.
At any rate, man, being
clever, was already combining traits from different animal orders for
his refreshment needs. Why, the bottle-opener might have come
about because of the claws of the sea-faring crustacean! Like lobster
claws. Perhaps folks told the bottlecap inventor, “Hey, your
invention rules! But I can't get at the beer without breaking the
bottle. And I hate that.”
A digression: Before bottle-openers, I imagine the only way to open a bottle was to break its neck (origin of the phrase "I'll break your neck!"). And of course, even if you're very careful, you'll no doubt be drinking bits of glass (which is why pirates said "Arrr!" a lot). There were contests as to who could break the bottle highest on the neck (so to spill the least amount of beer) and whoever broke the highest got to select a food item from the mayor's larder. This was generally cheese, since the mayor caught on quickly to the scheme. Okay, I have to apologize-- I just made all that up.
Well, we last left the inventor being
confronted about his unopenable bottlecaps. And the inventor told the
assembled rowdies, “Well, I'll go on a sea voyage, that helps
me think.” And the rowdies passed the hat for sea tickets. But
I bet the inventor saw crabs and lobsters before he even left the
dock, and got the bottle opener idea right away, and cancelled his
sea tickets. (He probably left a cold six in a stream and came back
later to find the crayfish had uncapped all his brewskis, and they
were all flat and bad tasting. And he was going to stomp the
crayfish, but they had all fled, fearing just this scenario.) So the
inventor pocketed the money. I bet he told the rowdies and other
folks that he went anyway, just so he could charge the expenses to
his clients. Man, what a bastard! I'm sorry I brought his story to
light, now. And then he sold the idea to advertisers (which explains
the bit about logos and slogans and “Sorry, you are not a
winner” stuff). But they all bought it, didn't they?
Advertisers--creeps, aren't they? Like lawyers. Hey, even my brother,
who is a lawyer (and a good one) hates other lawyers. He laughs at
all the lawyer jokes. But he'd probably hate this website. No, he
wouldn't say so, cos he's my brother, but he'd think it. A
lot.
Humph. Enjoy your screw-top bottles! You creeps!
________________
Nihila, the ancient Egyptian queen, hated everything, and usually burned it.
________________
He
threw up his lucky charms. So begins one of the greatest works in
the history of human literature.
Those six words shine like
jewels in the firmament of the arts, beloved by men, women and
children alike, celebrated, intoned, thought and cherished.
When
heard, they evoke the chills of grand adventure and quicken the
heart; when read, they open the vast doors of imagination, and send a
knowing thrill down the spine as they unfold their wondrous world.
At
least, that's how I imagine it will go, once I write the rest of it.
Posterity, here I come!
___________________________________
Just
in case you're reading this in 2047, right now in 2004 there's this
incredibly popular television program called SpongeBob
SquarePants. (Do a Google search if your incredible
futuristic minds have no idea what “television program”
and “incredibly popular” mean. I'm probably not the best
source for that kind of information. At least, not if you want
accuracy.)
The show is made up of various action figures
inhabiting an undersea realm. It's a lot like Toy Story (do a
Google search) except that the toys are all recognizable
action figures from movies. There's “Sandy” who is
obviously Ben Affleck from Armageddon, and “Mr. Krabs”
who is the Tim Curry character from Legend. “Patrick”
is a Stretch Armstrong doll (not sure how he fits in, I guess I
haven't seen enough movies), and “Squidward” is some kind
of Charles Nelson Reilly action figure, from that movie starring
Charles Nelson Reilly where people had an extra set of legs (I think
it was called An Extra Set of Legs). Finally, there's
SpongeBob himself, who is a piece of Swiss cheese.
Now, SpongeBob
is the puzzle, here. Not because he's not an action figure—good
heavens, how many movies has Swiss cheese NOT been a central figure?
Pretty much NONE, I figure.
No, the reason SpongeBob is such an
enigma is because I always figured that Swiss cheese, given mobility
and the power of speech, would be much more intelligent and
resourceful. But SpongeBob is an idiot, and what's more--
Hold on
a moment, I'm getting an Advanced Communique from the Telepathy
Archive Division (do a Google search), and they tell me that
SpongeBob is NOT Swiss cheese. He is, in fact, an actual sea sponge.
Well, I guess I could adapt my argument and say that I always figured
that an actual sea sponge, given mobility and the power of speech,
would be much more intelligent and resourceful than SpongeBob.
However, I'm happy to be proven wrong, of course. Still, unanswered
questions and all....
And I guess the real unanswered question is,
why would anyone make an action figure of Ben Affleck from
Armageddon?
___________________________________
Have
you noticed how super-heroes always choose names that are pretty
immodest? Like Superman, for example. Now, granted, he can do
everything in the world, ever, so maybe he has the right to call
himself “Super.” I mean, he is better than everyone else,
so, okay, bad example.
But how about the Fantastic Four? They're
not as powerful as Superman, not as...totally awesome!
(Swoon). Ahem. Well, so, what should they call themselves? Well, the
Human Torch could be called Hot Guy. The Thing could be called The
Whatever. The Invisible Girl could be the No-See-Um. And Mr.
Fantastic could be called Mr. Pretty Decent. And the team name could
be the Pretty Good Guys. (They blew stuff up a lot, remember.)
And
just to be fair, Superman could call himself Really Good Guy. I mean,
as long as we're diminishing expectations and all. The proceeding has
been brought to you by the Overweening Fairness Commission.
___________________________________
Speaking
of names, you know we could've avoided a lot of torch-waving
villagers (a fire hazard) if Frankenstein's creation was
called something other than "Frankenstein's Monster."
I
mean, "Monster" is just not a good name for anything, not a
name you'd choose, I mean. I bet Dr. Frankenstein was not
thinking, "I'll make a kill-crazy giant who will terrorize the
countryside and hey, may even bring me to my inevitable demise!"
Sure, he was a mad scientist, but he wasn't that mad.
So,
what was Frankenstein trying to do? The book is a bit vague,
but in the movies he's always trying to create a new kind of
person. A better kind of person, too. He wants to make
everything great. It's not really his fault that it came out cruddy
(usually Igor is to blame).
So, I think we should scrap the name
"Frankenstein's Monster," and instead call him
"Frankenstein's Nice Try." I think that could make
everyone all around feel pretty good, and I'm sure it would put a
damper on those peasants and their torches. Who'd want to kill
someone's "nice try"? That's just downright mean, and
you should all be ashamed of yourselves. And put away those
torches before you hurt yourselves! You're going to put out
someone's eye, mark my words.
___________________________________
Have
you noticed that when people talk about personality types, they are
always divided into four? I imagine this started with the four
elements of Earth, Air, Fire and Water, which became the mediaeval
personalities of Melancholic, Phlegmatic, uh, the Other One, and the
Other Other One. Okay, I'll have to edit this one later. The other
ones were firey and air-y but I can't recall the names. I know I'll
remember them as soon as I post this. If I do, I'll put 'em in
brackets.
[The others were Choleric and Sanguine. And yeah, I had
to look 'em up. Damn it! Sure wish I was a genius and all.]
But
Carl Jung posited four types, too, and people today talk about
inner-directed outers, and outer-directed inners and such like that.
There are lots and lots of self-help type books which posit different
types of personalities. They always end up being four in
number.
Note, too, that the simplest genetic table is also
contains four spaces (for the various combinations of dominant and
recessive genes). There are also four seasons, and four points to the
compass.
What's up with the number four?
Notice, though, that
in artistic things the most common series number is the trilogy:
three.
Does this indicate somehow that four is the perfection of
balance, but man's creations are less perfect, less balanced? Is that
why these products of man have no correlation in nature? And does
their very lack of perfection make them artistic? Does the lack of
perfection make us seek them out as a way to experience what it is to
be human, while the fours of this world make us feel trapped in
something that doesn't change? If you prefer three to four, or four
to three, what does that say about your personality, if
anything?
What will happen if the question mark key on my keyboard
stops working? I'm sure I'll cry bitter tears about that, so don't
even say!
I know there's this whole thing called Numerology which
probably explains this stuff, but if it's so right, why ain't it
rich? I suppose I'll look into it someday cause I like keeping my
mind open, but I think I'll develop my own thoughts on this, and
maybe I'll write myself one of those four-types books. See you on the
best-seller list!
___________________________________
What
are dreams?
Yeah, I know, that's a question that's going to be
answered in 25 words or less. But they've always been a part of the
human condition, they've been researched for hundreds of years,
they've been warnings and portents and part and parcel of history.
Religious and political leaders have had dreams which have outlined
the paths of history.
What would we be, as a species, if we didn't
dream? Would we still be living in caves, or would we be living in
some silver spandex-clad future?
I kind of doubt the latter. It
seems to me that the question “What if?” and the question
“Why?” are a form of inducing waking dreams, which lead
to changes and new ways of thinking. Which of course leads to further
questions, further changes, further dreams. But that's not what I
want to talk about here.
What I want to know is, where do dreams
come from, and when they get here, what do they have access to? What
kind of resources. Do dreams have access to future events? As I said,
many religious and historical events came about because someone had a
dream, which they called a Prophecy. The Australian aboriginies have
a ritual called the Walkabout, which I do not pretend to understand,
but I believe the dream world is involved. I honestly wish I knew
more, so I could tell you here. Another topic to
research.
Personally, I wear a pager at work, and the staff
rotates being “on call” when we can be awakened at any
time during the night. And I have had many, many dreams where someone
says, “Let me push this button,” they push the button and
a loud buzzing noise sounds...and I am awakened by my pager.
So,
what exactly is going on, here? The way I see it, there are two
possibilities. One: the entire dream happened in the fraction of a
second it took for the pager to go off and my brain to recognize the
sound, even though the dream itself seemed to go on for many minutes,
if not hours. This is certainly a possibility. I can recall some
dreams where I was speaking to people I knew, and upon waking, I
could recall that the dream person looked nothing like the real
person. But I knew who it was. Dreams deal sometimes with fragments
of information, the same way our brains do. We see “an apple”
and the brain registers the concept and goes on, without really
looking at the details of the object in question. In the same way,
the dream might present the concept of “Ted” or “Shannon”
and we accept and go on. Maybe if we look a bit harder, we can see
the details and remember the discrepancies when we wake up.
It
may be the same way way with time. The dream may present us with “an
hour” and again, we accept it and go on, even though the “real
time” may be too small to be measured. The dream may simply
hand us concepts one after the other without fleshing them out at
all, and we go on. Like reading a book. We read the words and if the
author is good, we see the people, the places, hear them speaking and
watch them act. Just from words. Perhaps dreams work in the same
way.
Again, this is plausible, but it seems to indicate that
either our brains are capable of doing incredible things...or dreams
come from some hidden place in our minds, something apart from
ourselves, that have access to our thoughts and memories, and feed
them back to us? I don't know about you, but that sounds a little
unsettling. I mean, for the most part dreams are benign, but you
always hear the one about, if you dream you're falling, and you don't
wake up before the impact...you die! “Your dreams can kill you,
say top researchers.”
The second possibility is, that dreams
somehow have access to a wider area of perception than our regular
minds do. That perhaps, they can access the future.
That would
explain how the dream knew that my pager was going to go off. And it
might explain those dreams of the religious and political leaders,
those dreams of Prophecy. And if these dreams do access the future,
maybe it means our minds can access the future as well, which would
explain a lot of ESP folks. (One might know another's thoughts simply
because they had already occurred in the future.) And it might
explain those dreams people have which change the world. Dreams of
new technology, new ways of thinking, new Whys, and new What ifs.
In
the movie 2001, the aliens never appear, though at the end they are
definitely in evidence as they watch Bowman adjust, age, die and be
reborn. All this takes place in a few moments of screen time. My own
theory is that the aliens are pansynchronous—a word I coined
that means they exist simultaneously in all moments of time,
simultaneously. For them, it's like having an array of still
photographs around them. They can choose to see any one of them, at
any time. Backwards, forwards, none of them are closed, unlike our
own minds. They can visit any photograph and it is still happening.
We can only view the past after it has happened. We can't view the
future until it becomes the present, and then the past.
Maybe,
unlike our conscious minds, our unconscious minds aren't shackled by
time. They can pick and choose among moments past, present...and
future. And cook those into our dreams. Maybe. Maybe....
Lots of
folks have theories on dreams. I wonder, though, how many of those
theories are developed to fit another theory. We may never know.
Perhaps, perhaps it will come to us in a dream....
________________
As of May 31, 2004. To be continued....
________________
Have you ever noticed
how potato chips taste a whole lot better when they're in a bowl,
rather than in a bag? (A clear glass bowl is best.) Why do you
suppose that is?
Maybe, it's because they're happier in the bowl.
They can see what's going on around them, and it's probably a big
outdoor picnic with games and people having fun. Or, someone's
watching a great movie, with thrilling explosions or devious aliens
(or maybe even both!).
Whereas, in the bag, you're just in a bag.
A dark bag, filled with moaning depressed fellow chips, all of whom
are griping about their lot or wailing for forgiveness. I imagine
such an atmosphere would be pretty uncompelling.
So what does
that have to do with taste? Outside the bag, you have a wonderful
time glimpsing fun all around you, true, ending with crunching teeth
or first smothered in “dip,” but that extra zest of
experience makes you square your “shoulders” (work with
me here) and give a really good crunch of yourself. You're the same
chip inside the bag, but no glimpse of this better, happier world.
There you are with the rest of those losers in the bag, and remember,
contents may have settled during shipping—you know what that
means, chip dust. That plays havok with your allergies I bet. It's
probably a lot like working in some horrible office where everyone
hates his or her job, the difference being take-home pay (probably
better for you chips). So, from dank bag to rank gizzard, with
perhaps only a stop in some dip that should have been thrown away
before it went “bad.” Its no wonder the first group
tastes better, they have more to taste for. I bet the second group
actually shudders as the teeth close in on them. Have you ever eaten
anything that shuddered before as you were biting it? Let me tell
you, it's an experience you will never forget, and not in the good
sense. I'm sure they also let out little moans. And I bet they get
stale and soft a lot faster, probably because they just hate
themselves so much.
Now, you might be asking, why should I help a
race of giant enthusiasts enjoy themselves if it the whole plan ends
when they eat me? Well I must say that's typical of your attitude and
that's a good reason why you'll never be a good potato chip. You
might as well stop trying now, you don't have what it takes I'm here
to tell you. It's just not your “bag,” ha ha ha.
Yes,
I know you already have the hat. You should seriously reevaluate your
career path. Maybe being a hot dog is more in your line, or perhaps a
nice jar of relish? Either way, you'd be refrigerated. I imagine
you'd like that, wouldn't you.
As for me, I wish I had a bowl. A
nice glass bowl. Instead, I'm surrounded by increasingly morose bags,
half-filled with sour, dispirited and desperate chips. I think I hear
them, murmuring and whispering....
The lights. Oh my God, what
happened to the lights?
________________
I think
it's a sure sign of genius when someone sprays a vaguely cheddar
cheese taste on small crackers and sells them in a box. Where's
the genius, you ask? The genius is in making the crackers
shaped like little smiling fish! Rather than some dull
geometric shape, one can chuff vast handfuls of mock sea-pals!
If that's not the howl of genius I hear, then I don't know what
is! Just to be safe I'm going to make sure the doors are all
locked.
________________
I saw a sign on the back of a
truck today that said MIDDLE EARTH BARBER CORPS. As I got closer
though, the words changed to VEHICLE MAKES FREQUENT STOPS! Wow, I
knew Elven magic was powerful and all (and I can understand why the
Middle Earth Barber Corps needs to stop frequently--they must dull
their shears on the dwarfs' beards daily) but I didn't think they
could change the very words on a sign! I mean, without repainting it.
I could do that, that's not magic at all and don't let anyone tell
you otherwise.
I asked my cats about it, and they were unconvinced
of what I had seen.
Cat 1: "It's just your bad eyesight. It
always said the vehicle part. You just can't read at a distance, and
your brain tries to make sense from inadequate hints. When you got
close enough you could see what it actually said."
Cat 2:
"Yeah, you really need new glasses, man."
Cat 3: "I
hate everything."
So, even my cats are in on this conspiracy.
I guess I need to be careful and atch-way y-may ep-stay.
________________
I
don't think I've ever seen a “Director's Cut” that I've
liked better than the original. “Aliens” seems bloated,
dumber and more pointless. “Lifeforce” lost its drive and
focus and added ridiculous bits. Well, yes, “Lifeforce”
already had ridiculous bits, but you didn't notice 'em cos the movie
moved so fast. And “Legend”? It seems tired and overly
precious and lots dirtier (in the filth-flying-though-the-air sense)
and I, for one, just wanted the film to get the heck on with it.
Granted, the theatrical version of Legend seems like it was made by
Italians...perhaps there's not really a good version of Legend out
there. It would make sense. “Star Trek The Motion Picture”
may have had its problems in the theatre, but the “new”
version out on DVD just seems...wrong. Given the passage of years and
the improvement of film technology, you can basically redo anything,
but is it a good idea? I mean, why stop with the special effects? Why
not replace Leonard Nimoy with Tom Hanks, and William Shatner with
Russell Crowe? (Boy, did I just give some casting director a great
idea. There's another million I'll never see.)
Well, I seem to
have gone off topic. Like that's never happened.
So, more isn't
always better. In many cases, like Star Trek, it's the picture of an
era, a form of historical document. In a hundred years, this stuff
will be seen as fine art. And you don't put a mustache on the Mona
Lisa just because it makes it new and different. Well,, you do if
you're Marcel Duchamp, but he's a special case (and another
topic).
The cut of George Romero's “Dawn of the Dead”
that I first saw was about 20 minutes longer than the standard
cut...mostly containing scenes that fleshed (sorry) out the
characters. There was a later, R-rated version released which was
much more comic-book-like, very slick and professional, but without
the resonance of the first version. So, finally, a “director's
cut” that I like? Well, guess again! Lo and behold, it turns
out Romero prefers this second version. So I still don't like
“Director's Cuts.”
I wonder why Romero prefers the
short version? It's very slick, and maybe he's just tired of being
the “independent” “maverick” who never gets
any “jobs”. It must be tempting to want to work in
Hollywood and get films made on a steady basis, instead of the cult
hero whose projects are either cancelled, direct-to-video, or given
to other directors. “Resident Evil,” yes, I mean you.
They just did a big remake of “Dawn of the Dead” here in
the crawling chaos of 2004, and Romero's new project “The Ill”
shows that it got cancelled. Then again, it was about vampires so not
a big loss.
I wonder what cancelled films would have been really
great movies? I bet if you talked to the writers, they'd say “All
of them.”
________________
I'm sure you know the word
“Dinosaur” comes from Latin words meaning “terrible
lizard.”
Did you realize that means Fred Flintstone named
his pet “Terrible”?
So, whenever “Dino”
runs out of the house (pets do this), he has to roam the
neighborhood, bellowing at the top of his considerable lungs,
“Terrible! Terrible! TERRIBLE!” And all his neighbors
bellow back (using their own prehistoric lungs) “It's not that
bad!” “Yeah, shut up, some things are okay!”
“Shaddap ya drunken philosopher!” You see, that last guy
was confusing Fred Flintstone with that ancient Greek philosopher who
was always walking around with a lantern looking for an honest man.
This is because the ancient Bedrockians had so little history they
were always getting it all mixed up. Good for them that they knew
Latin, though, huh? Even I don't know Latin, and I've been
told I'm kind of clever with that stuff I did. Once.
So, Fred
Flintstone naming his poor pet “Terrible.” Of course,
what can you expect from a man who can't even swear properly?
Now,
what I'd really like to know is, what did people mean when they
called Dean Martin “Dino”? Did they think he was a
Flintstone pet, or did they think he was terrible? I can't speak
about the former assumption, but really he wasn't terrible. He did
some good songs. And he did that thing, you know, that he was famous
for. That wasn't half bad.
________________
These things are all getting longer and longer. I mean, they're supposed to be little tiny things. They're still tiny things, but they're not so tiny anymore. They're half damned essays! And the essays page isn't even populated yet, as of today. What to do? Um...let me, get back to you on that.
________________
As of June 30, 2004. To be continued....
________________
I wonder who named that food called "borscht." I know it's probably Yiddish or Slavic or something, but man, it sounds just like the noise you'd make coughing it up again.
________________
If clouds were life-forms, I wonder what their
lives would be like. You drift around and stuff, occasionally
darkening and pouring water on people. Then you see them shake their
fists at you. Sometimes, you can snow on them too. Hail, sleet, ice,
those rains of fish or blood you hear about--the possibilities are
endless it seems. But then, if you (as a human I'm talking now) watch
clouds as they move across the sky, you can see parts of them kind of
tear off and disentegrate.
I wonder if that hurts?
________________
You know how sometimes when you try something, and it doesn't work, so you start hitting it or banging it to make it work, and it still doesn't work, only now you're afraid you've broken it and it may never work, so you try again but very softly and all hoping Man-I-hope-I-didn't-just-bust-this-stupid-thing-Please-work-just-this-once-Sorry-about-calling-you-"stupid"-but-I'm-slightly-going-crazy-here and eventually you realize that it's not broken but just isn't going to work and the thing to do is to sit back and try to relax and let it cool down a bit, do something else and come back later to it and maybe it will be all right? Well, this July has been a lot like that. See you next month.
________________
As of July 30, 2004. To be continued....
________________
When will people learn that pizza is a
right, not a priviledge?
________________
I thought up a new word, “electroniclowns.” Admittedly, this sounds like something Forest J Ackerman would have coined, but he didn't, I did. So, if you want to use it, feel free (I won't charge anything) but you really ought to give me credit. It's the decent thing to do, after all, unless you're one of those rotten electroniclowns.
________________
There was
this chap that no one liked, and he made this special kind of
cake-mix that you could use to coat your house in a protective layer
of cake. The idea was, it would make your house all warm and toasty
and nice to be in, and also, if you fell down and stopped working,
you could eat cake while you waited for better times.
The problem
was that the cake was as inferior in ingrediental make-up as the chap
who invented it (as you'll recall, no one liked him) and it rotted
rather swiftly. Soon, the house-holders who had been foolish to trust
this man found that their houses rotted into funguous masses of
black, rotten horror, which collapsed into swirling pools of ichor,
sometimes with valuable furniture or memorabilia trapped
inside.
Well, several countries (Britain, Spain, Italy, Japan and
some of those other places that are all foreign) issued a review of
this even-less-liked chap's invention, and it was a scathingly
negative one.
It was titled “The International Pan of House
Cakes.”
________________
You know what would be a great device? A
remote control for traffic lights. Just think: you're driving along
when, ahead of you, the light turns yellow. With the push of a
button, you turn it green again, and drive on through! I'd probably
wait for the programmable remote, though, the one where you can tell
it that the lights along some certain path should all be green while
you're driving through there.
Then, naturally, there would be
Remote Wars between opposing drivers, with more and more powerful
remotes being wielded by drivers. In fact, you might drive with a
passenger whose sole function was to Remote the lights. (Remember how
they laughed when you spent all that time playing Xbox? Now you can
laugh right back!)
Criminals could use the remotes to elude the
police, but then the police could remote right back so the criminals
would get pancaked by a semi—a semi filled with retired
fruitcake!
I bet this idea makes someone a billion dollars, and I
bet they don't give me a dime for all my brainstorming.
________________
I read a lot of “blogs” on
this “internet” thing. And I've discovered that I no
longer watch the electroniclowns on the network news anymore. And you
may beg to differ (go ahead, beg! Beg!) but I think I'm better
informed because of it.
________________
I took some
pictures of the Moon recently. I used this huge zoom lens that I
have, and a teleconverter, and while they weren't perfect, they were
pretty cool.
The thing is, I don't know if the Moon thought I was
a paparazzi, or if the Moon was frightened by the lens, or what,
but...I haven't seen the Moon since.
If any of you know
the Moon, would you mind telling it that I just wanted to take some
pictures, and I wasn't trying to wreck its privacy or be snoopy or
anything. <Scuffling feet> I just wanted some pictures of the
Moon. Also, mention in passing that I would like to take more, so
that if it sees me, it will know what's going on and not get all
scared or offended.
Thanks!
________________
Have you ever been in the drugstore,
walking down unfamiliar aisles, and you suddenly spot something that
sounds like a solution to one of your problems? “Oh, hey, I
have [some symptom, “owl-shaped eyes,” or whatever]! This
sounds perfect!” And you purchase the product, bring it home,
and then start to read all the caveats?
“NOT to
be taken INTERNALLY. If ANY of this gets inside you, you will SHRINK
to the SIZE of a COIN.”
“NOT to be used other than
for its STRICTLY DEFINED USE. Any other USAGE will turn you into the
tallest MAN in the WORLD.”
“If ANY of this TOUCHES
your TONGUE, you will POSSIBLY BURST.”
“DANGER!
Use of this product near WATER may cause DINOSAURS to ATTACK.”
“NOT
to be used as a FLOTATION DEVICE, DAMN you!”
“Do
NOT use near an OPEN FLAME. DOING so will DETONATE the SUN.”
I
have a whole shelf of these things, all carefully put away. I'm not
only afraid of USING them, I'm afraid of OFFENDING them.
________________
Remember how comic books would put on the
cover, “Because YOU demanded it!” and would then go on to
proclaim, “The ORIGIN of MEAT-GUN!”
Well, I don't know
about you, but I never demanded any such thing. Had comics been run
my way, it would have read, “Because YOU demanded it! ONE
HUNDRED DOLLARS!”
I would have bought every issue, too. If,
on the other hand, you demanded the origin of Meat-Gun...well,
nice going. We could have had one hundred dollars.
________________
If they introduced a super-hero called The
Astonisher, with the tagline, “He can do anything you
imagine!” I'd say, “Well, I can imagine him buying
me some cigarettes.”
You might get away with it, too.
And if not, being on the side of justice and all, the worst the
Astonisher could give you was a stern talking-to.
________________
If someone says to you, “I used to be
a gorilla, but now I'm much smaller,” chances are good that
you're talking to a chimpanzee. One way to be certain is to “Check
his library”—if there are a lot of books about bananas,
it's a good guess you've found your chimp.
One bit of bad advice
is, “Check his pants.” It turns out that this is a
threshold for many, many species, and now you've got a furious
creature all mad at you, and you don't even know what kind of
creature it is. You don't even know if offering it a banana would
help.
________________
I think a pretty good mutant power would
be to always know what the opening weekend business of any movie is
going to be, down to the dollar. You could make some good money
betting with your friends. However, they'd soon grow suspicious of
your hidden nature, and you'd probably have to drift from town to
town, making a few bucks here and there before your reputation caught
up with you, and you'd have to move on.
But you'd know in advance
which theatres had unpopular movies in them, and you could probably
catch some sleep that way. And if the movie woke you up, well, free
movie.
________________
You know, people need things. But I don't think things need people.
________________
I saw the Moon last night! I'm glad to know
it was not gone permanently. I didn't take any pictures, because I
didn't want to take any chances and mess things up again.
Hey,
thank you very much to whoever passed the word on to the Moon. Kudos!
________________
Stephen Den Beste is an insightful,
thoughtful, thorough and engaging writer. He has written brilliant
essays on a wide range of subjects, from politics and history, to
science and military matters, to anime and popular culture. In times
when others have sounded alarms and raised the flag high, his calm,
rational and reasonable words have brought needed sanity, at least to
me. His website, denbeste.nu, is one that I visit daily, and I always
learn something.
A couple of days ago, I learned that Mr. Den
Beste has decided to cease writing for the web. In his latest, and
apparently last post, he details the reasons. I'll summarize,
probably getting many details wrong, but here goes.
Apparently,
he deals with a flood of emails every time he posts, some supportive,
some combative, some nitpicking, According to his final post, the
anticipation of these responses started to make him hesitate to
write, as he could imagine the letters; he began to hate the idea of
posting his thoughts, and finally he decided it wasn't worth it. He
wasn't enjoying it anymore. A cloud of electronic wasps took shape
and overwhelmed the urge to share his insights.
In the past, I
wrote him a couple of times (simple questions) which he graciously
answered. I kind of feel bad that I did that, but I did and I can't
take it away. So I was part of it. (I always hesitated before
sending--I felt terrified, in fact--but I did anyway.)
However,
what he may not understand, and what I barely kind of understand, and
what I'm going to bark on about anyway, is the power of his thinking.
It is so clear, so reasonable and so enlightening, that it's
understandable why it's so attractive to want to become a part of it,
to participate as well as read, to contribute to what is clearly a
great, ongoing work.
Other web writers (notably James Lileks,
who is also brilliant) have complained of this kind of attention,
which from their point of view I can see as an annoyance. You write
something, and a storm appears on the horizon. It may be a hailstorm
or a storm of fresh candy, eitherway, there's a lot of it and there's
no escape. You watch it form, knowing that you brought it about. The
web brings the world closer, perhaps too close, so that's it's easy
to see a great writer not as some unapproachable titan, but as a
next-door neighbor. How many sit-coms have you seen where the “wacky”
next-door neighbor was actually a moronic pain-in-the-rear.
It's
a shame that neighbor had his final say, and Mr. Den Beste will post
no more.
Brilliant thinking will not disappear from the web,
but the internet is much poorer now.
Mr. Den Beste, I will
miss your work.
Thank you.
________________
As of August 31, 2004. To be continued....
________________
I recently read Frankenstein for the first time. For the most part, rather dull it is. After about 100 pages of flowery talk and flouncing fancies, with a bit of harumphing about the Dark Arts, the Monster is created and escapes in a couple of paragraphs! Then there's some other dull bits with a couple of distant murders, and finally F catches up with the FM and the M tells his story about living in a hovel and that story goes on forever! And it just goes on from there, with a bunch of yearning and aching and rueful regrets, etc. Then everyone DIES! How they managed to spawn a multi-million dollar monster legacy from this...this...this THING completely escapes me, like most other things.
________________
Speaking of books, did you notice that around the same time Poe was foaming with ghouls, novels were frequently issued with two titles? "Frankenstein: Or The Modern Prometheus" was how the novel ref'd above was published. Others'd be like "A Rotten Man, or, Giles Gets His Dampers" or "Reprehensible, or, Beneath Contempt." Has anyone ever referred to these books by the second title? Did authors think that people would buy the book twice or something (because people would think it was a new book), or were they just trying to give readers more of a choice (“I read The Red Pencil, and liked it.” “Harumph, well, I read The Green MeatBall, and hated it!” [hankies flung and swords drawn])? Say that could be another book: Hankies Flung, or, Swords Drawn.
________________
I was driving in my car on a road the other night, and I saw this restaurant called Applebees which is a chain. You may, perhaps, have at one time seen one! Anyway, the "Apple" part of the sign was burnt out, so all it said was "bees" which struck me as quite the humorous affair. Imagine hearing someone say "Hey, let's go to this place that's called 'bees'! They might have thousands of bees in there! We can eat our dinner under a genuine threat" Then, imagine being right for once!
________________
Have you noticed that the word "smattering"
doesn't seem to have any form other than its own gerund? People say
"There was a smattering of newpaper advertisements around the
old gentleman's leisure chair" but no one ever says "I
think I'll go smatter some grass seeds on the lawn" or "That
damn dog smattered our garbage again."
Likewise, the word
"feckless" doesn't seem to have a positive form, ie,
"feckful." Usually one hears of a "feckless youth"
and it means a somewhat gawky, gangling adolescent covered in a thin
layer of slightly sticky sweat. But no one would ever refer to a
handsome, confident man as "feckful." Or "fecking,"
that's just too dangerous to say! Also "gawky" doesn't have
a negative, "gawkless" which would be good to apply to
things like sleeping cats or the resting elderly.
________________
I thought of a new kind of product that could be quite lucrative: Ghoul Chow. It couldn't be more foul than many cat foods (Sea Horror, Blanched Charnal, Humans-Faint-O'er-It, Mashed Deadcake). You could probably buy ghoul chow in large sacks, and it may be the kind that "makes its own gravy" and perhaps Ghouls ask for it by name! And they might have Senior Mix for old ghouls. There's a million dollars waiting for someone to open this market, plus, the Ghouls think you're “okay” and they won't, well, you know, um, eat YOU instead.
________________
When you're taking a shower, and as you're
washing yourself, and chunks of you start falling off as you're doing
it, I suppose like me you think, “This can't be a good thing.”
But can you think of any circumstances when it would be a good
thing?
Well, I can think of one: if you were a rampaging,
radioactive giant monster who was stomping on, and threatening, and
eating (ick) mankind—in short, doing all the things
which consistute “Menacing Mankind” (above the level of
“Bothering Mankind”)--then, yes, it would be a good thing
if you decided to bathe and that turned out to be your destruction. I
mean, can't you just hear the music take an upswing while the
narrator talks about how this must have been part of the Grand Design
of Things? I wish I could buy that soundtrack, you know, for everyday
life!
But of course, if you are hearing that music, it
probably means you're a monster from the fifties, so you're probably
pretty old anyway and were just about to toddle off to Monster
Heaven. You know, hibernating for millions of years followed by a few
weeks of intense activity really takes it out of you. Plus, being
millions of years old would probably make you pretty crotchety. Maybe
that's why Godzilla et al were always rampaging: they were just darn
cranky and, let's face a few facts here...I've never been to Tokyo,
but in the films and pictures and stuff I've seen, and from what I've
read, it's a riot of noise and color and flashing lights. It seems
just the sort of place to make an old person all bitter and stuff.
And if that old person was fifty feet tall and had atomic breath,
well....
________________
As of September 30, 2004. To be continued....
________________
Have you
noticed how we refer our pets' genders?
We say, I have two
"male" tabbies, or my labrador retriever is a good "girl."
We never refer to them as "men" or "women." And as for "ladies and gentlemen," I think you can forget that! At least until they stop knocking my stuff off the tables. Ladies and gentlemen don't knock things off tables
________________
I had written earlier about how
flies' own buzzing must drive them to distraction, which is why
they've never achieved anything better than “fly.”
However, I have to wonder if the opposite is true for bees
(who are, after all, frequently used as a metaphor for
industriousness). Perhaps their buzzing (admittedly less lackluster
sounding than fly noise) is something they use to keep up the pace,
as it were. They may thrive on noise, which is why shouting at them
has no effect.
So I wonder what would happen if they put a CD
of John Cage's music into their little bee CD players. They would
probably enjoy the buzzing and clanking of the prepared piano works,
but what would happen when they "heard" his imfamous work,
4'33" (which consists solely of silence)?
Why, they would
expect sound of course, and the unexpected silence would probably
drive them berzerk! I bet this is how swarms start.
In fact, I
would further bet that teenage bees, who play the work as a "prank,"
feel pretty bad about the mayhem they caused, and straighten right
out and become productive members of (bee) society.
There's a
lesson for us all in there somewhere.
________________
Surfing the
internet used to be like visiting the Library of Congress and the
British Museum at the same time, while seated in the largest shopping
mall in the world, surrounded by friendly people and helpful search
engines.
Now, with popups, spyware, email farming, page
hijacking and I don't know what else, it's like going alone into the
bad part of town at midnight when the buses have all broken down, the
police are on strike and most of the streetlights are burned out.
It
used to be fun to go exploring. What amazing new things you could
find. Now, you'd be a fool to do that.
Who's responsible for
all the spyware and your farmbots and such? Creeps and jerks, to be
sure, but perhaps something else. I've been thinking lately that
perhaps there are things that actually live on the internet (like
those things that live in hyperspace), and they have these powers,
see, and their using our human brains to propagate themselves. Maybe
these spyfarms and wreckbots and what-not are their way of
reproducing and flourishing.
I'm starting to scare myself....
________________
As of October 31, 2004. To be
continued....
________________
“I
fished it out of the trash and ate it the next day.” If
presented with this sentence, the first question is, was it fished
out of the trash the previous day, then allowed to sit around and rot
pervasively until the guy decided to eat it? Or was it fished out
the shortly before it was eaten, and thus, it had little time to
develop any sort of resentments against existance?
Questions
like these are why I keep reading about grammer and punctuation
(though none of it seems to sink in, thanks for your criticism). If
English classes dealt with eating things out of the trash, I suspect
I would have paid more attention, and would now be teaching you stuff
you have to learn. Instead, you have to read it here. For free.
Um,
never mind.
________________
It's interesting how food
reacts to life, isn't it? I mean, pretzels become stale when they
become soft. But bread becomes stale when it becomes hard! I mean,
there must be some kind of “staleness mean” where all
this makes sense, but our poor human brains will never see it. The
philosophical stuff about TOAST doesn't even bear thinking about!
And don't try it, either, because your head will explode and that is
costly. And someone has to clean up after you, too.
And don't
even start about how, a cold drink becomes warm, and a hot drink
becomes cool.
I think it's great that our ancestors learned to sip
things, and eat things delicately with pinkies out-thrust, otherwise
this kind of fascinating factual material would never have come to
light. I mean, if we just devoured stuff by the handful, we'd never
learn about staleness and bad temperatures. Imagine if we had four
or five hands, and several mouths! We'd probably never have learned
anything, and we'd still be living at the bottom of the ocean or
something. And you wouldn't be reading this, so pay attention! Be
glad I'm here to tell you this stuff.
________________
Sometimes, stuff isn't funny.
Like someone who had to fish something out of the trash to have
something to eat. That just isn't funny. In fact, it's a bit
repellent. Or sad, depending on your orientation. No, wait, it's
just repellent.
________________
“Wine” and
“cheese” are fascinating things. Both are highly valued
and sometimes quite tasty. But, both are also things that have gone
bad. Wine is grape juice that has started to rot. Cheese is milk
that has gone bad.
I'd sure like to have seen it when these things
were tasted for the first time. It was probably in cave-man days,
and it went something like this (fade)....
“Oog, got any
more of that goat's milk?”
“Yeah, but it's several
days old. You can have some, though.”
“Oh.
Look.”
“What?”
“Something's happened to
it.”
“Wow! It's all yellow, and it's kind of
solid!”
Both, together: “Let's see what it tastes
like!!”
...(fade) I imagine the scene would be very similar
for wine, except that they'd discover it tasted pretty bad, but they
couldn't resist it anyway. Then they would have driven their
Flintstone-type cars into trees and things.
On second thought, I
don't think I would have liked to have seen these things. For one
thing, they were millions of years ago, and that was even before
videocassettes.
________________
As of
November 30, 2004. To be continued....
________________
I think it would be pretty alarming to be walking along the beach and find a clam on the shore, and when you opened it, the clam had your face.
________________
You know what would be funny?..what's that? A circus clown? Good Lord, man, no that wouldn't be funny, that would be the first step on a downward plunge into terror! I had no idea you had these ideas. Here, just to keep you safe, are the seven warning signs (with two CD-only bonus signs) of circus clowns.
1. Large, colorful tents.
2. Calliope music.
3. Suddenly, you can't buy cream pies—of any variety—anywhere.
4. People with huge noses and giant grins trying to be funny.
5. Fat people (of any variety)
6. Discarded puppets, and/or strings.
7. Chewing gum everywhere. Chewing gum=unrest. Unrest=?
8. People with feet that are just way too huge.
9. Giant piles of dead bodies that the police can't explain.
If you encounter any two of these things, you should run and run and not stop until you're well clear of anything at all.
You're welcome.
________________
If they ever invent a snack shaped like people's noses, well, if you and a pal of yours are out motoring around, and he suggests buying a bag of (say) Lay's Nose Crunchettes, you could say, “Well, that's a snack I wouldn't 'pick',” and be known as a certifiable wit in your chosen social circle.
That small, cold, dim social circle.
Still, it's better than...something.
It must be better than something.
________________
As of
December 31, 2004. To be continued....
________________
If you were to take dollars, and stack them into a staircase, I wonder how many of them it would take to reach the Moon? Probably more than I've got on me.
________________
I've discovered a sure-fire cure for dorkiness. The bass guitar. Think about it: Don Knotts as Barney Fife: dorky. Put a bass guitar in his hands, though, and he's the edgy bassist from some New York band. Bob Denver as Gilligan: dorky. With a bass guitar, though, he's a guy in a power-pop band. Who else? Eddie Deezen? He becomes someone in a synth-pop band, probably the guy who also writes the lyrics. Elmer Fudd? He could be in a scary downtown industrial band, a dance outfit, or a respected jazz player.
So, all you geeks, dorks and nerds, that's all you need! Just carry around a bass guitar all the time. Everywhere you go, people will say, "Wow, I thought he was a dork, but after seeing him with the bass, he's completely cool."
A regular guitar would not work, by the way. That is because you have to invest a regular guitar with your own personality, and you need a decent one to accomplish more than the hop from "Dork" to "Dork with guitar." No, no, only the bass guitar possesses the necessary coolness in and of itself.
If I could have patented this, I would have, but I didn't invent the bass guitar. That's the only reason you're getting this for free. You're welcome.
________________
There used to be (and may still be) a fast food chain called "Hot & Now." This seems tailor made for those who lack both discernment and patience. I don't recall if I ate there, but since I lack both qualities as well as memory, I probably did.
I wonder what other kinds of "Hot" restaurants would be successful? "Hot & Spongy" I can imagine would have them lined up around the block; one can only picture the happy patrons bouncing with anticipation as they near the order window. "Hot & Pasty" on the other hand, would probably be a sad place, whose few patrons were simply caught in its negative pull, unable to escape, like flies in honey.
________________
I think they should make a postage stamp with a picture of the guy who invented the Mellotron.
________________
As of
January 31, 2005. To be continued....
________________
...I couldn't think of anything worth saying for an entire month! Not only that, but I didn't write any of it here! See you next month...
________________
As of
February 28, 2005. To be continued....
No one is happy when cats begin to vomit. Or even when they threaten to vomit. In fact, if you see someone really happy when a cat is about to vomit, you should suspect that they are not really a real person. They're some kind of android copy, but obviously not a very good one.
________________
I wonder if the person who invented the banjo knew the Hell he was about to unleash on Earth.
________________
I think if we had eyes in the backs of our heads, we wouldn't go very many places. Think about it: while you're walking, and looking forward at things coming toward you, you're also looking backward, at things you're leaving behind. I think the whole thing would make you sea-sick.
You know, I bet that people who get sea-sick have vestigial third eyes in the backs of their heads. They probably think they're pimples or something. If they only knew, eh?
________________
The Muppets are pretty popular things. As I'm sure you know, they got their name from the combination of "marionette" and "puppet." It's kind of scary how close history came to giving us The Puppionettes.
________________
You know what would be a cool feature on a car dashboard? A traffic light sensor. It would tell you how long the light was going to be a certain color. So, if it was red, you'd know you only had another 18 seconds left before it turned green, and you could drive, and get out of my way faster.
Similarly, if I saw that a light was about to turn yellow in 15 seconds, it would give me a chance to floor it.
________________
Anyone who sits down to write an opera obviously doesn't care about the children.
________________
I wonder if the folks who live on Mars make up stories about invading Earth people? I hope they don't picture us with giant, exposed brains, because I'd have to wear a hat, and hats just don't look good on me.
________________
As of
March 31, 2005. To be continued....
________________
Laugh, Clown, Laugh say the philosophers. But I bet if it was a Mind Clown, they'd say something different. Stay Away From Me, Mind Clown, Stay Away, they'd say, their voices barely above a whisper as they huddled, hidden in the darkness from the prowling, hungry Mind Clown.
________________
It's a good thing that when people laugh, they all laugh the same way. Because if everyone had their own style of laughing, civilization would probably never have started. Plus, there'd be all that noise.
________________
If a person asks you to watch over a dill pickle while he goes and mails some letters, that person is probably the Devil, trying to tempt you into some kind of pickle-related sin. Just remember you have free will and you should be okay. Of course, you could always say, “No thanks, Satan!” and run away.
________________
If you imagine a whole number between nine and ten, you've got quite an imagination.
________________
I bet you could make a lot of money if you call the Copywrite Office and claim you lost one of your copywrites. The clerk would ask you to describe it, and you could say something vague about size or color, and nine times out of ten they'll help you with the description until they say, “Well, I have a copywrite right here that fits that description” And you can say, “Oh, that's mine, wow, I've been so worried all night long!” And you'd start getting money from that copywrite. Good luck with the scheme, and remember your friends here.
________________
Have you noticed how DVDs fit EXACTLY into a DVD player? I'm starting to think that's more than a coincidence.
________________
As of
April 30, 2005. To be continued....
________________
You know, sheets of living cells are called “tissue,” and a sheet of thin paper is also called “tissue.” This brings up an interesting question, well, interesting to me anyway. If we collected a huge wad of tissues (the paper kind) and let them kind of, well, coalesce, what kind of life form would develop? I mean, it's a collection of tissues, what the heck kind of definition of life do you want?
Anyway, scientists could study it, and learn to communicate with it. And I bet one of the first things it would say is, “Parts of my substance appear to be snot. What kind of god allows this?”
They’d have to bring in all kinds of religious leaders to resolve this, and this might finally pave the way to an end to the long conflict between science and religion. So, I sure hope someone starts this project soon, but don’t look at me. Used tissues? Eww!
_______________
You know what’s really funny? Heh-heh-heh. You’ll love this. It’s totally hilarious when…oh. Wait. That’s not funny. Not funny at all. In fact…that’s just damn sad. Oh, my. Excuse me, I have to go weep softly into some (unused) tissues. Oh my God this is so tragic.
_______________
Have you ever seen the cartoon, Samurai Jack? It’s pretty cool, and it’s educational too. I’ve learned that most problems can be solved with a bit of creative thinking plus a magic sword. Next time the boss yells at me, I know what I’m going to do. Thanks, Jack!
_______________
Pretty much all fruits and vegetables have juice counterparts. Apple juice, grape juice, pineapple juice, tomato juice, carrot juice…the list is endless, well, endless enough for me anyway.
However, some earthen products have been neglected. How come we don’t have potato juice, onion juice, or mushroom juice? I bet they’re just as healthy for us, perhaps even better. Someone should look into these, because it would be good for humans to drink them, I’m just betting.
Oh, but don’t ask me to drink them. Mushroom juice? Yuck, talk about instant throw-up!
_______________
If frustration was a source of power, I could light up…well, some minor hamlet somewhere that no one cares about. (Except the people who live there. Never forget them. They haven’t forgotten you. And they will thank me for my service to them, and you who frustrate me…make ready. At dawn we strike! In my name shall ye wring your regrets, to whatever heaven fails to hold you!)
_______________
Smoking, drinking, gambling…it’s high time that the twenty-first century came up with some new naughty pleasure, don’t you think? Why else even have a new century, then, if it's just the same old stuff.
________________
As of
May 31, 2005. To be continued....
_______________
I once bought a pound of sharp cheddar cheese so I could have a friend. Boy, do I miss his wit! It's just a terrible tragedy that he tasted so good on crackers. I'm still broken up by it. Well, not really, but that's a better ending than the original one, where I make millions of dollars and am happy. Hey--wait a second!
_______________
If spaghetti grew on trees, imagine how terrible that would be. They'd plop spaghetti down on the ground all day, and they'd probably make awful moaning noises while they did it. We'd have to create a race of robots to just scoop up the awful droppings all day long, and that race of robots would have to dump the tree's fruits somewhere where it wouldn't bother anyone. And I bet they'd grow resentful of their task, and grind the spaghetti into powder, and put it everywhere! Sometimes evolution is so kind, we should form a fan club.
_______________
Have you noticed how most video games are about shooting aliens? What's the agenda here, anyway? And how do you suppose real aliens would react if they landed and wanted to have peaceful relations, and found out we spent our leisure time blasting them! I suspect they'd get angry and refuse to leave gifts. Good thing we've got lots of practice shooting them, and then taking their gifts anyway! Sometimes things just work out pretty well. Not often, but you gotta give props for the few occasions.
_______________
I bet a few years ago, if you told someone, "Sorry, I've got to be blogging," or "I have to update my blog," they would think you were using euphemisms. How right they'd be! Back then, I mean, before there was such a word. Back then, they'd probably advise more fiber in the diet.
_______________
It turns out, most problems can be solved by staging a puppet show. Just passing on the wisdom, here....
_______________
People should remember to shoot zombies in the head. Now, you may think I'm being cruel or taunting, but it's just common sense. Shooting them in the stomach or foot, or trying to get them to sign a non-devouring contract, why, those are just foolish. And no one wants to be foolish. Well, except people who are paid to be foolish, but really that's worse than a zombie job. There aren't any brains, for one thing.
_______________
I sometimes wonder what it would be like if I was a lobster. Why, I'd probably type things like "yu/.l rklt jnyioppoi rereqm..m" because, as anyone who has tried to type with lobster claws knows, that's about the best you can hope for. So, you should just be thankful I'm not a lobster. I tell you. I should get paid for not being a lobster. Come on, people, pony up! Wait a minute, the cops are here. Just act natural. Don't act like a lobster.
________________
As of
June 30, 2005. To be continued....
_______________
July, 2005: Overslept.
________________
As of
July 31, 2005. To be continued....
_______________
August, 2005: Couldn't find a parking place.
________________
As of
August 31, 2005. To be continued....
_______________
When they tag bears and sharks with those tracking devices, they should also put wireless internet antennas on them too. That way, if you're lost in the woods, you can still keep up with email and news and things when bears attack. Maybe you could order some anti-bear stuff from eBay!
Now, to get a good signal, you would have to have the bears or sharks nearby, but not so near that you'd be in danger. That would take a lot of practice, and in fact I bet people would have to be certified. It'd be like, well, we're still lost in the ocean, but the sharks got bored, so open up another chum packet--I want to check how the market is doing.
_______________
You know, if you want to get people's attention, there are few better ways than to jump up and down and shout how you have a thousand dollars for each person.
Of course, the corollary is that, once you have their attention and explain that you don't really have all that money, but wanted their utmost attention, many of these people will hit you, hard, in the face with their fists. And you'll never get to tell them what you originally wanted to tell them, which was probably something like "Help!"
That's probably a great experiment in human nature. Write me if you try it.
_______________
Sometimes, humor comes in the most unexpected guises. Like if you woke up in the middle of the night, convinced your liver was exploding, but it turned out